<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>economic laws &#8211; Geoffrey Allan Plauché, PHD</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gaplauche.com/blog/tag/economic-laws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gaplauche.com</link>
	<description>Writer, Editor, Web Designer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 03:57:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Arthur C. Clarke must never have read Mises and Rothbard&#8230;</title>
		<link>https://gaplauche.com/blog/2008/01/15/arthur-c-clarke-must-never-have-read-mises-and-rothbard/</link>
					<comments>https://gaplauche.com/blog/2008/01/15/arthur-c-clarke-must-never-have-read-mises-and-rothbard/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoffrey Allan Plauché]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 04:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[(Austrian) Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction and Fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American SF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arthur C. Clarke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British SF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gregory Benford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ignorance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Locus Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ludwig von Mises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murray Rothbard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientific laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space elevators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gaplauche.com/blog/?p=271</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[Updated version at Prometheus Unbound and The Libertarian Standard.] &#8230;because according to this quote cited by Gregory Benford in his happy-birthday letter in Locus Magazine (January 2008), he claims that &#8220;there are some general laws governing scientific extrapolation, as there are not (pace Marx) in the case of politics and economics.&#8221; Well, far be it [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[[Updated version at <em><a class="vt-p" href="http://prometheus-unbound.org/2011/03/30/news-arthur-c-clarke-vs-economics-and-capitalism/">Prometheus Unbound</a></em> and <em><a class="vt-p" href="http://www.libertarianstandard.com/2011/03/30/arthur-c-clarke-vs-economics-and-capitalism/">The Libertarian Standard</a></em>.]
<p>&#8230;because according to this quote cited by Gregory Benford in his happy-birthday letter in <em>Locus Magazine</em> (January 2008), he claims that &#8220;there are some general laws governing scientific extrapolation, as there are not (pace Marx) in the case of politics and economics.&#8221; Well, far be it from me to disagree that Marx was wrong about a lot of things, but Clarke is wrong here. Sir Clarke, you may be 90 years old now, and happy birthday by the way, but it&#8217;s never too late to acquire a firm grasp of sound economic theory.</p>
<p>Benford does report some remarks by Clarke I do agree with, however. For example: &#8220;for the one fact about the Future of which we can be certain is that it will be utterly fantastic.&#8221; Sounds <a class="vt-p" href="http://prometheus-unbound.org/2010/11/10/editorial-american-vs-british-science-fiction/">more American than British</a> to me.</p>
<p>And here&#8217;s another: &#8220;exact knowledge is the friend, not the enemy, of imagination and fantasy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Finally, here&#8217;s one that evokes, for me at least, the evils and waste of statism: &#8220;All this effort, all this death, when we could be building the staging area for a seaborne space elevator.&#8221;</p>
<p>Update: In his May 2008 memorial letter for Clarke, Benford adds two more quotes that I like:</p>
<p>&#8220;There is hopeful symbolism in the fact that flags do not wave in a vacuum.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;New ideas pass through three periods: It can&#8217;t be done; it probably can be done, but it&#8217;s not worth doing; I knew it was a good ideal all along!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gaplauche.com/blog/2008/01/15/arthur-c-clarke-must-never-have-read-mises-and-rothbard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
