<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michael Stackpole &#8211; Geoffrey Allan Plauché, PHD</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gaplauche.com/blog/tag/michael-stackpole/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gaplauche.com</link>
	<description>Writer, Editor, Web Designer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:11:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Stackpole, Doctorow, and Intellectual Property</title>
		<link>https://gaplauche.com/blog/2009/10/26/stackpole-doctorow-and-intellectual-property/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoffrey Allan Plauché]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[(Austrian) Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction and Fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cory Doctorow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creative commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Stackpole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SF/F]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gaplauche.com/?p=672</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Cory Doctorow recently announced an experiment to prove that giving away free ebooks works. Michael Stackpole responded with a deconstruction of Cory&#8217;s experiment. He makes a number of good points about the experiment, though I think he comes off unnecessarily harsh on Cory personally. And one gets the impression that he feels threatened by the growing [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cory Doctorow recently <a class="vt-p" href="http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/columns-and-blogs/cory-doctorow/article/15883-doctorow-s-project-with-a-little-help.html">announced an experiment</a> to prove that giving away free ebooks works. Michael Stackpole <a class="vt-p" href="http://www.michaelastackpole.com/?p=543">responded with a deconstruction</a> of Cory&#8217;s experiment. He makes a number of good points about the experiment, though I think he comes off unnecessarily harsh on Cory personally. And one gets the impression that he feels threatened by the growing anti-IP movement. He has his own (antiquated) business model and bottom-line to protect after all, though I applaud him for being a pioneer in experimenting with ebooks and podcasting. One remark of his in particular, in his second blogpost on Cory&#8217;s experiment (&#8220;<a class="vt-p" href="http://www.michaelastackpole.com/?p=555">What is Cory Doing Right?</a>&#8220;), cuts right to the heart of the matter. I left a comment on his blogpost in response but for whatever reason it hasn&#8217;t appeared yet and might never appear [Update: must have been stuck in moderator limbo, <a class="vt-p" href="http://www.michaelastackpole.com/?p=555#comment-612">it finally appeared</a>] , so I&#8217;m reproducing it below:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;For some reason folks think it&#8217;s okay to say to a creator of intellectual property that the product of our labors should be free; yet they never convincingly press that argument at a farmer&#8217;s market.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is because intellectual property is not legitimate property, whereas a farmer&#8217;s produce is. You might check out the following:</p>
<ul>
<li>Stephan Kinsella, &#8220;<a class="vt-p" href="http://mises.org/story/3682">The Case Against IP: A Concise Guide</a>,&#8221; <em>Mises Daily</em> (Sept. 4, 2009).</li>
<li>Stephan Kinsella, <a class="vt-p" href="http://mises.org/books/against.pdf"><em>Against Intellectual Property</em></a>, Mises Institute (2008).</li>
<li>Roderick T. Long, &#8220;<a class="vt-p" href="http://libertariannation.org/a/f31l1.html">The Libertarian Case Against Intellectual Property Rights</a>,&#8221; <em>Formulations</em> Vol. 3, No. 1 (Autumn 1995).</li>
<li>Michelle Boldrin and David K. Levine, <a class="vt-p" href="http://www.dklevine.com/general/intellectual/againstfinal.htm"><em>Against Intellectual Monopoly</em></a>, Cambridge University Press (2008).</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
