<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Scientific Forecasting vs. Forecasting by Scientists</title> <atom:link href="http://gaplauche.com/blog/2007/08/30/scientific-forecasting-vs-forecasting-by-scientists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://gaplauche.com/blog/2007/08/30/scientific-forecasting-vs-forecasting-by-scientists/</link> <description>Aristotelian-Liberal Political Philosopher</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:08:06 -0500</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Geoffrey Allan Plauche</title><link>http://gaplauche.com/blog/2007/08/30/scientific-forecasting-vs-forecasting-by-scientists/#comment-126</link> <dc:creator>Geoffrey Allan Plauche</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 17:46:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://gaplauche.com/blog/?p=213#comment-126</guid> <description>See also this recent &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2007/12/22/contaminated-temperature-data/&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blogpost&lt;/a&gt;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See also this recent <a
HREF="http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2007/12/22/contaminated-temperature-data/" REL="nofollow" rel="nofollow">blogpost</a>.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Geoffrey Allan Plauche</title><link>http://gaplauche.com/blog/2007/08/30/scientific-forecasting-vs-forecasting-by-scientists/#comment-125</link> <dc:creator>Geoffrey Allan Plauche</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 06:34:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://gaplauche.com/blog/?p=213#comment-125</guid> <description>Your information is out of date and incorrect. Check out the date on that graph you linked to in Wikipedia. It&#039;s based on data from 2006. My post is about a much more recent discovery of a significant error in the US temperature data (one among others). Given that US temperature data is a significant part of the global record, readjustment of the US temperature data will effect global temperature. That graph needs to be revised.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your information is out of date and incorrect. Check out the date on that graph you linked to in Wikipedia. It&#8217;s based on data from 2006. My post is about a much more recent discovery of a significant error in the US temperature data (one among others). Given that US temperature data is a significant part of the global record, readjustment of the US temperature data will effect global temperature. That graph needs to be revised.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: smally lerned</title><link>http://gaplauche.com/blog/2007/08/30/scientific-forecasting-vs-forecasting-by-scientists/#comment-124</link> <dc:creator>smally lerned</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 05:15:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://gaplauche.com/blog/?p=213#comment-124</guid> <description>1998 was the warmest year on record (in the last century or so) globally. 1934 may have been the warmest in the US.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Similarly, what you write about the 10 hottest years is &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Instrumental_Temperature_Record.png&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;not the case&lt;/a&gt; globally speaking. Maybe you also mean that to apply only to the US.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1998 was the warmest year on record (in the last century or so) globally. 1934 may have been the warmest in the US.</p><p>Similarly, what you write about the 10 hottest years is <a
HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Instrumental_Temperature_Record.png" REL="nofollow" rel="nofollow">not the case</a> globally speaking. Maybe you also mean that to apply only to the US.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
